When future usage is not the same as in the past (as with most non-stationary systems), collecting data that includes all possible future usages (both load and environmental conditions) becomes often nearly impossible. Īs mentioned, a principal bottleneck is the difficulty in obtaining run-to-failure data, in particular for new systems, since running systems to failure can be a lengthy and rather costly process. The two basic data-driven strategies involve (1) modeling cumulative damage (or, equivalently, health) and then extrapolating out to a damage (or health) threshold, or (2) learning directly from data the remaining useful life. In addition, data-driven techniques also subsume cycle-counting techniques that may include domain knowledge. Data-driven approaches can be further subcategorized into fleet-based statistics and sensor-based conditioning. The main disadvantage is that data driven approaches may have wider confidence intervals than other approaches and that they require a substantial amount of data for training. physics-based models, which can be quite narrow in scope). Therefore, the principal advantages to data driven approaches is that they can often be deployed quicker and cheaper compared to other approaches, and that they can provide system-wide coverage (cf. Data-driven approaches are appropriate when the understanding of first principles of system operation is not comprehensive or when the system is sufficiently complex such that developing an accurate model is prohibitively expensive. Since the last decade, more interests in data-driven system state forecasting have been focused on the use of flexible models such as various types of neural networks (NNs) and neural fuzzy (NF) systems. The classical data-driven methods for nonlinear system prediction include the use of stochastic models such as the autoregressive (AR) model, the threshold AR model, the bilinear model, the projection pursuit, the multivariate adaptive regression splines, and the Volterra series expansion. Technical approaches to building models in prognostics can be categorized broadly into data-driven approaches, model-based approaches, and hybrid approaches.ĭata-driven prognostics usually use pattern recognition and machine learning techniques to detect changes in system states. The discipline that links studies of failure mechanisms to system lifecycle management is often referred to as prognostics and health management ( PHM), sometimes also system health management ( SHM) or-in transportation applications- vehicle health management ( VHM) or engine health management ( EHM). Potential uses for prognostics is in condition-based maintenance. Such knowledge is important to identify the system parameters that are to be monitored. It is therefore necessary to have initial information on the possible failures (including the site, mode, cause and mechanism) in a product. An effective prognostics solution is implemented when there is sound knowledge of the failure mechanisms that are likely to cause the degradations leading to eventual failures in the system. The science of prognostics is based on the analysis of failure modes, detection of early signs of wear and aging, and fault conditions. Prognostics predicts the future performance of a component by assessing the extent of deviation or degradation of a system from its expected normal operating conditions. The predicted time then becomes the remaining useful life ( RUL), which is an important concept in decision making for contingency mitigation. This lack of performance is most often a failure beyond which the system can no longer be used to meet desired performance. Prognostics is an engineering discipline focused on predicting the time at which a system or a component will no longer perform its intended function. This article is about the engineering discipline.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |